Now showing items 1-4 of 4

    • Asymmetry, disagreement and biases: epistemic worries about expertise 

      Holst, Cathrine; Molander, Anders (Taylor and Francis, 2018-12-03)
      This paper contributes to an on-going exchange in political theory on the normative legitimacy of expert bodies. It focuses on epistemic worries about the expertization of politics, and uses the Nordic system of advisory ...
    • Epistemic democracy and the role of experts 

      Holst, Cathrine; Molander, Anders (Palgrave Macmillan, 2019-01-01)
      Epistemic democrats are rightly concerned with the quality of outcomes and judge democratic procedures in terms of their ability to ‘track the truth’. However, their impetus to assess ‘rule by experts’ and ‘rule by the ...
    • Epistemic Worries about Economic Expertise 

      Holst, Cathrine; Molander, Anders (Routledge, 2019-11-21)
      The focus of the chapter will be on this epistemic worry. We show that the substantive involvement of economic experts in policy-making raises some real epistemic concerns. However, we move beyond the uneasiness that many ...
    • Public deliberation and the fact of expertise: making experts accountable 

      Holst, Cathrine; Molander, Anders (Taylor & Francis, 2017)
      This paper discusses the conditions for legitimate expert arrangements within a democratic order and from a deliberative systems approach. It is argued that standard objections against the political role of experts are ...